Legal Opinion
Gardner, Bruce E v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 9, 2000No. 14-7197PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Bruce E. Gardner appearing pro se appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging violations of federal and state law by federal and state authorities, primarily as a result of the disclosure of his tax returns and tax information, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12 (b)(1), (2), & (6) and 41(b). For the reasons set forth in a companion case, Gardner v. United States, 211 F.3d 1305 (D.C.Cir.2000), the dismissal under Rule 41(b) cannot be affirmed. However, we conclude that the dismissal was proper under Rule 12(b) essentially for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Michael E. Hubbard v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Frank Mangan and Kevin ManganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Nichols v. TruscottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Ross v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Golden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Welborn v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.