Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank Mangan and Kevin Mangan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 3, 1978No. 553 and 554, Dockets 77-1326 and 77-1339PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
Fraud, Lord Macnaghten said, Reddaway v. Banham, [1896] A.C. 199, 211, is “infinite in variety.” These appeals reveal a variety new at. least to us. The fraud became' possible because appellant Frank Mangan was an IRS Agent, working at the Mineóla, L.I.,' office. According to the Government, the scheme, perpetrated by Frank and his brother Kevin, was this: Frank obtained the names and social security numbers of seven taxpayers, six named John McCarthy and the seventh Scott Murphy. 1 In January and February 1972, Frank prepared 1971 income tax returns for these…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. SalernoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Derek Blackmon, Sidney Jones, Tyrone Stephens and Cecilia Grace RolandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.