Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 20, 2004No. 3:00-cv-00581PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DICLERICO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs National Wildlife Federation, Arizona Wildlife Federation, Maricopa Audubon Society, Sierra Club, and The Wilderness Society (“Environmental Plaintiffs”) brought suit against the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) challenging two decisions pertaining to the Arrastra Mountain Wilderness. Erik and Tina Barnes, who own land affected by the decisions, brought suit against the Secretary of the Department of the Interior, and two BLM officials. 1 The cases have been consolidated. All of the parties move for summary judgment based on a…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lyon v. Gila River Indian CommunityDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- McFarland v. KempthorneDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2006
- Donohoe v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022