Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stewart referred to this court a Findings and Recommendations (F & R) [74] in this matter. The F & R recommends granting plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [44], denying defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [56], and enjoining any work on the road at issue. Defendant United States Forest Service (USFS) and plaintiff Friends of the Columbia River Gorge, Inc. (Friends) both filed timely objections and responses.
When a party objects to any portion of an F & R, the district court must conduct a de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Panciera v. Ashaway PinesSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010