Legal Opinion
Odegard v. E. Quist, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 29, 1961No. Civ. 20074PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The defendant moved, by notice of motion heard November 8,1961, for leave to amend its answer so as to add limitation of liability as a partial defense. On the same day the court heard plaintiff’s cross-motion to vacate a set of interrogatories propounded by the defendant on October 18, 1961. The plaintiff’s cross-motion was granted from the bench. The court now denies the defendant’s motion for the reasons hereinafter stated.
The complaint was filed August 13, 1959. The plaintiff alleged that he was injured while in the employ of the defendant and aboard the defendant’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Norwich Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Steamship Co. v. MountSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- The ChickieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Barge W-701Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. BARGE W-701District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1979
- Barger v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
- Blunk v. Wilson Line of Washington, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Federazione Italiana dei Consorzi Agrari v. Mandask Compania de Vapores, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.