Legal Opinion
Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. BARGE W-701
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 18, 1979No. Civ. A. 70-3491PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACK M. GORDON, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The plaintiffs, Signal Oil & Gas Company, Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, Amerada Hess Corporation and Marathon Oil Company (hereinafter referred to as “SLAM”) initiated this admiralty action to recover damages sustained by a pipeline in which the SLAM group owns a 90% interest. Plaintiffs sued, among others, the Barge W — 701, in rem ; its owners, Wil liams-McWilliams Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Williams-McWilliams”); Sun Oil Company and Aequitane Oil Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Sun”);…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The City of NorwichSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Webb v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Marion Lee Avera and Daniel J. Avera v. Florida Towing Corporation, Florida Towing Corporation v. Marion Lee Avera and Daniel J. AveraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Barge W-701Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- S & E Shipping Corp. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Ryan Walsh Stevedoring Co. v. James Marine Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Slater v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Schexnider v. McDermott International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.