Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Barge W-701
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
This appeal marks the second time this sad affair of a ruptured pipeline has been before this court. A bifurcated trial was ordered below, and the liability findings and conclusions were affirmed per curiam in an unpublished opinion by a panel of this court in 1976. The decision rendered by the district court in the damages portion of *1167these proceedings, recorded at 468 F.Supp. 802 (E.D.La.1979), prompts the present appeal. An abbreviated summary of pertinent facts is presented here; the factual situation and the attendant relationships among the several parties are more…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Richardson v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Continental Oil Company v. Bonanza Corporation, and Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Peter Fabrics, Inc. v. S.S. "Hermes"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Tommy Lynn Weathersby v. Conoco Oil Company, Conoco Oil Company v. Global Marine, and National Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Continental Oil Company v. Bonanza Corporation and Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.