Legal Opinion

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Rosatto

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 12, 1908No. 12Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the BrunswickBalke-Collender Company, owner of patent No. 623,933, for a bowling alley, granted April 25, 1899, to William H. Wiggins, filed a bill against Frank Rosatto, charging infringement thereof. On final hearing that court, in an opinion reported at 159 Fed. 729, held the patent void. From a decree dismissing the bill the Brunswick Company appealed. The object of the patentee was to improve the construction of bowling alleys with reference to the “ball-gutters” or troughlike conduits alongside the alleyway. These gutters serve to carry to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1903
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. BeyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
  3. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co. v. RosattoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Drexel v. Northwestern Terra Cotta Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API