Legal Opinion

In Re Rogers

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1966No. 8649PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, Justice:

Formal charges were filed against Martin S. Rogers, hereinafter referred to as re spondent, to the effect that he had violated the Canons of Professional Ethics of an attorney at law.

The charges upon which the board of governors found against the respondent grew out of the handling of the estate of Olivia M. Kuhlmann,/ deceased, while he was executor. The board of governors found that:

Count One, he had purchased from himself individually a certain 1957 Ford automobile for the sum of $825.00, and that said sum was greatly in excess of the fair market value of the automobile,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re Disbarment of MyrlandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In Re MacDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re TribbleArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re SweeneyArizona Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Matter of WeinerArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In the Matter of WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, LoftusArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API