Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Myrland

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1934No. Civil No. 3336PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an original proceeding in disbarment. The record shows that one U. S. Kay, of Tucson, Arizona, made complaint against Otto E. Myrland, hereinafter called respondent, an attorney of that city, charging him with unethical conduct in' regard to a case which Myrland had handled for Kay. A grievance committee of the state bar association investigated the complaint and recommended that disbarment proceedings be instituted against respondent, and the Attorney General therefore brought the matter before us. A referee was duly appointed and evidence taken, which has been examined by the court.

T…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In Re WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re SweeneyArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re MaltbyArizona Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API