Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenship

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 862SC17Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant assigns error to the court’s failure to charge on self-defense. We believe this assignment of error has merit.

The right to act in self-defense is based upon necessity, real or apparent, and a person may use such force as is necessary or apparently necessary to save himself from death or great bodily harm in the lawful exercise of his right to self-defense. A person may kill even though it be not necessary to kill to avoid death or great bodily harm if he believes it to be necessary and he has reasonable grounds for such belief. The reasonableness of his belief is to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API