Legal Opinion

Evans v. Armour and Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1965No. Civ. A. 38085PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, Chief Judge.

This is an action for a preliminary injunction brought by a stockholder of Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, (hereinafter designated “BLH”), on behalf of himself, the corporation and others similarly situated, to enjoin the holding of a stockholders’ meeting of BLH on June 10, 1965 called specially for the purpose of approving a merger of BLH into Armour and Company, a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter designated “Armour”).

BLH is a manufacturer of “capital goods.” Armour, primarily known as a food and meat processing corporation, has also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Borg v. International Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bird Coal & Iron Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Richland v. CrandallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Dillon v. BergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  4. Brundage v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  5. Lewis v. NewmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API