Legal Opinion
Luckett v. Conlan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 16, 2008No. 07 C 3300PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Willie Luckett (“Plaintiff’) filed a three-count amended complaint against Officers J. Conlan (“Conlan”), P. Palider (“Palider”), and the City of Chicago (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs amended complaint includes a new cause of action (Count II) against Defendants Conlan and Palider for conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff of constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). Defendants now move to dismiss Count II. For the reasons stated below, and in open court on June 4, 2008, the Court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- William Cannon, Jr. v. Odie Washington, Director, Ronald Haws, Rodney L. TallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McDaniel v. Loyola University Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Clements v. T-Mobile USA, IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P. v. TourisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Ford v. Becton, Dickenson and CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
- Grafton v. FoBelkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.