Legal Opinion

Clements v. T-Mobile USA, Inc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 17, 2023No. 5:22-cv-07512Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 BRADFORD ARTHUR CLEMENTS, Case No. 5:22-cv-07512-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED 10 v. COMPLAINT 11 T-MOBILE USA, INC, et al., Re: ECF No. 23 Defendants. 12 13 Petitioner Bradford Clements (“Clements” or “Petitioner”) moves for leave to amend his 14 “Petition to Compel T-Mobile to Submit to Arbitration Governed by California Law in Santa 15 Clara County, and in Accord with the Parties’ Written Agreement, and to Stay the Pending Texas 16 Arbitration” (“Petition”). ECF…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Denny Lee LONDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Mann v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API