Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2001No. Civ.A. 98-657(JHG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
On March 16, 1998, Edward L. Totten (“Totten”) brought a qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA” or “Act”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et. seq., against Bombardier Corporation (“Bombardier”) and Enviro-vac, Inc. (“Envirovac”). On December 15, 1999, the government declined to intervene in the case. Currently pending are motions to dismiss by both of the defendants, in which they argue that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, that Totten has failed to state a claim, that Totten has failed to plead fraud with the required particularity, and that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.