Legal Opinion
Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 2002No. 99-CV-79, 99-CV-80PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Opinion of the court
2Per curiam
On February 15, 2001, in Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Auth., 766 A.2d 974 (D.C.2001) (Dingwall I), a division of this court held, inter alia, that in an action for negligence against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (WASA), appellant Carolyn A. Dingwall' was not required by D.C.Code § 12-309 (1995) to provide pre-suit notice to the Mayor.' Id. at 977-79. The division further held that D.C.Code § 43-1672(b) *687(1998), which provides in pertinent part, with exceptions not here applicable, that WASA shall be…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Gross Ex Rel. Spears v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
4Cited by6 opinions
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Belcon Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority v. Delon Hampton & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- ETDH Associates v. Waterfall Ventures, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.