Legal Opinion

Dingwall v. District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2002No. 99-CV-79, 99-CV-80Published

1Opinion of the Court

800 A.2d 686 (2002)

Carolyn A. DINGWALL, Appellant,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Appellee.

Nos. 99-CV-79, 99-CV-80.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued November 6, 2001.

Decided May 30, 2002.

Carolyn A. Dingwall pro se.

Jack W. Campbell IV, appointed counsel amicus curiae, with whom Robert H. Klonoff, Washington, DC, was on the brief, argued in support of appellant.[*]

James C. McKay, Jr., Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Robert R. Rigsby, Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before…

Also in this document: Dissent · Farrell; Dissent · Ruiz.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. Gwinn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Braxton v. National Capital Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Kelton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Campbell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API