Legal Opinion

People v. Tannahill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1976No. 12384PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simkins

This is an obscenity action involving three defendants. On July 5,1972, undercover police officers entered a Bloomington adult bookstore and purchased four sexually explicit magazines from defendant Gary Eugene Whitbeck. On July 18, 1972, officers bought five similar magazines at the same store from defendant Robert Hayden. Whitbeck and defendant Clarence Allen Tannahill were the owners and operators of the store and Hayden was an employee. The State charged Whitbeck and Tannahill with nine counts of possession with intent to disseminate obscene materials in violation of section 11 — 20(a)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. People v. RidensIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  3. State v. BumanglagHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. People v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API