Commonwealth v. Rosenberg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The central issue on appeal is whether the part owner and manager of Sam’s Spa, a neighborhood variety store in Everett, was properly convicted of knowingly disseminating obscene matter in violation of G. L. c. 272, § 29.
After a trial by jury, Nathan Rosenberg was found guilty of disseminating the May, 1976, issue of Hustler magazine, knowing it to be obscene. Rosenberg appealed from the denial of his motion for a directed verdict made at the close of the Commonwealth’s case, and we granted direct review on our own motion.
Rosenberg claims that the Commonwealth failed to produce sufficient…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ApplebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GallisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- AM. BOOKSELLERS ASS'N, INC. v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. United Books, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.