Legal Opinion

State v. Bumanglag

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1981No. NOS. 7161, 7162, 7208 & 7209PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

These consolidated appeals involve interlocutory orders issued in four criminal cases where the defendants have been charged with promoting pornography in violation of HRS § 712-1214(1)(a). 1 The questions raised by defendants-appellants are whether motion picture films that are primary evidence of the putative offenses were improperly seized and therefore are excludable at trial and whether HRS § 712-1216(1) 2 which makes the dissemination of pornographic material prima facie evidence of the disseminator’s knowledge of the character and content of such…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cammack v. WaiheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. PoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. State v. CornelioHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API