Legal Opinion

People v. Pope

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1985No. 2-84-1067PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hope

Defendant, Richard Pope, was charged with three counts of obscenity (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 11 — 20(a)(1)), each dealing with the sale of an allegedly obscene magazine. At a jury trial defendant was found guilty on all three counts. At a subsequent sentencing hearing the trial court imposed concurrent sentences of 120 days on each of the counts as well as consecutive fines of $1,000 on each count. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal.

In this court defendant contends: (1) that the Illinois obscenity statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 38, par. 11 — 20) is unconstitutionally…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Merchants National Bank v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. People v. BynumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Friedman v. Park District of Highland ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. OliverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API