Legal Opinion
Di Perna v. Black
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 25, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Memorandum A thirty-day notice of termination of tenancy in the city of New York to be served “ in the same manner in which a precept in summary proceedings is now allowed to be served by law ”, is void if served on Sunday (Real Property Law, § 232-a; Penal Law, art. 192, §§ 2140-2154; Hastings v. Farmer, 4 N. Y. 293; Tolman v. Heading, 11 App. Div. 264). Matter of D’Agostino v. Bernabel (269 App. Div. 853) is clearly distinguishable, as there the notice being served by registered mail, the tenant on the return day of the precept did not question jurisdiction of the Justice’s Court but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tolman v. HeadingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hastings v. . FarmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Cannon v. GordonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- D'Agostino v. BernabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Hedden v. NederburgAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hessel v. HesselNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Acierno v. KutchukCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Kyriacou v. KangelarisNassau County District Court · 1996
- Glenball, Ltd. v. TLY Coney, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Glenball, Ltd. v. TLY Coney, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008