Legal Opinion

Hessel v. Hessel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVincent A. Lupiano, J.

This is a motion pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act to set aside the service of process in this matrimonial action because the summons and complaint were served on Sunday.

*862The defendant appears specially and alleges that he was served with the summons and complaint in Augusta, Georgia, on Sunday, January 13, 1957. He does not deny that the service, made pursuant to section 235 of the Civil Practice Act, would have given this court proper jurisdiction if it had not been made on that day of the week. The plaintiff, on the other hand, admits the date of service but submits an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Vechten v. PaddockNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  2. Sawyer v. CargileSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. Hastings v. . FarmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Chafin v. TumlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Di Perna v. BlackAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1980
  2. Mayfield v. Dean Witter Financial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  3. People v. ChildersNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kyriacou v. KangelarisNassau County District Court · 1996
  5. Steiner v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API