Legal Opinion

Callender v. District Court for the Twentieth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1981No. 56044PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Petitioner, Callender, seeks to invoke the original jurisdiction of this Court and prays for a writ of prohibition to prevent the District Court of Carter County from proceeding further in a civil action, in the nature of quo warranto brought by the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma against Callender to try title to the office of County Commissioner which he holds.

The Attorney General alleged in his petition that Callender forfeited or vacated his office by reason of a plea of nolo conten-dere he entered to a misdemeanor involving official misconduct, as defined by 21…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Pinson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Bartlett v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Byrd v. State Ex Rel. RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Worley v. State ex rel. AsbillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Stipe v. State Ex Rel. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Callender v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Question Submitted by: Senator Mary B. Boren, Oklahoma State Senate, District 16, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API