Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Cloud District Court. Quo Warranto, instituted by the county attorney of Cloud county. The title of the action was, “ The State of Kansas, plaintiff, against George Bartlett, Peter McCrea, Frank McNulty, S. M. Ransopher, Harry Dobbs, A. W. Campbell, and Moses Heller, defendants.”- The petition set forth and alleged — “That the city of Clyde in said county and state is a city of the third class, under and by virtue of the general laws of said state; that by the…

Read the full summary

Error from Cloud District Court. Quo Warranto, instituted by the county attorney of Cloud county. The title of the action was, “ The State of Kansas, plaintiff, against George Bartlett, Peter McCrea, Frank McNulty, S. M. Ransopher, Harry Dobbs, A. W. Campbell, and Moses Heller, defendants.”- The petition set forth and alleged — “That the city of Clyde in said county and state is a city of the third class, under and by virtue of the general laws of said state; that by the same laws there has been created and exists in said city, for the purpose of good government thereof, and for the purpose…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action in the nature of quo warranto, brought by the county attorney of Cloud county in the name of “The State of Kansas,” to have determined by what authority certain persons were attempting to exercise *102the functions of certain city offices of the city of Clyde, Cloud county. The city, of Clyde is a city of the third class. Said persons were attempting to exercise the functions of the offices of mayor, police judge, and city council of said city. These facts, together with others, were set out in full in the petition filed by…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Reed v. Commissioners of Marion CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Taggart v. AddisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Byrd v. State Ex Rel. RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API