Legal Opinion
Clearasite Headwear, Inc. v. Paramount Cap Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 9, 1962PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
This is an action for alleged patent infringement. Defendant has moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has failed to comply with the venue requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1400 (b).
Since plaintiff has chosen to submit no affidavit in opposition to the motion, defendant’s affidavits in support thereof stand uncontradieted. Defendant is a Missouri corporation with its office and principal place of business in the State of Missouri. Defendant does not maintain a bank account in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Fennell v. BacheSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Watsco, Inc. v. Henry Valve CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1968
- Ipco Hospital Supply Corp. v. Les Fils D'Auguste Maillefer S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.