Legal Opinion

Adoption of Holly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 21, 2000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

After a trial, a judge in the Brockton Division of the Juvenile Court Department found S.C., the father of Holly and Mike, and K.L., the father of Paul and Nora,2 currently unfit to assume parental responsibility for their children, and that it was in the best interests of the children to terminate S.C.’s and K.L.’s rights to consent to the adoption of their children. The fathers appealed from the decrees permitting adoption and the orders denying their motions for a new trial. In an unpublished memorandum and order entered pursuant to its rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the decrees and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Adoption of MaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Department of Public Welfare v. J. K. B.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Care & Protection of StephenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Adoption of RhonaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Brown v. Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  4. Care & Protection of GeorgetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. In re the Welfare of G.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API