In re the Welfare of G.E.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
K.L. and C.E. appeal the orders that terminated their parental rights as to their children, T.E., N.E., and G.E. A commissioner of this court reviewed this matter under RAP 18.13 and a panel of judges decided subsequent motions to modify. The commissioner resolved all issues except one: Does the record establish that C.E. waived his right to be represented by counsel during the termination proceedings? It does not, and so we reverse.
FACTS
K.L. and C.E. are the mother and father of T.E., born January 24, 1999; N.E., born February 26, 1997; and G.E., born January 22, 1996. In March 1997, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ramsey v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- In re C.L.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Daniel Y. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- In re the Dependency of E.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State ex rel. Schmitz v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.