Kearney v. Snodgrass
Oregon Supreme Court
Umatilla County. Defendant appeals. Tbe facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWaldo, C. J.
This action was brought against Foster, Reeves, Snodgrass, and Minor, as partners and principals, and R. G. Thompson as surety, on a promissory note executed by Foster in the name of the partnership, Foster, Reeves & Co., and signed by R. G. Thompson as surety. Snodgrass and *312Minor, the appellants here, denied the complaint. They also set up as a separate defense that the note was given in execution of a contract made by Foster and Beeves with the plaintiff, to which they were strangers, and they also set up what they claim to have been the actual business relations between the alleged…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Carver v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- M'lanahan v. the Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Johnston v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Walton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Yarber v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- State of Oregon v. NodineOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1917
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.