Peel v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
Under the Small Claims Procedure Act, may a resident of Pope county maintain a suit in the municipal court of Pope county against a resident of Yell county upon a contract that was to be performed in Pope county? No, answered the circuit court of Pope county, and entered an order prohibiting the municipal judge from proceeding further in a $300 contract action brought by Harrell Motors, Inc., against the appellee, Gene Kelley. The municipal judge appeals from that order. We agree with the appellant: The suit is maintainable in Pope county.
The Small Claims Procedure…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Moose v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Markham v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- United Loan & Investment Co. v. ChiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Ashby v. MilliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bonnell v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.