Legal Opinion

Peel v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1980No. 79-292PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Under the Small Claims Procedure Act, may a resident of Pope county maintain a suit in the municipal court of Pope county against a resident of Yell county upon a contract that was to be performed in Pope county? No, answered the circuit court of Pope county, and entered an order prohibiting the municipal judge from proceeding further in a $300 contract action brought by Harrell Motors, Inc., against the appellee, Gene Kelley. The municipal judge appeals from that order. We agree with the appellant: The suit is maintainable in Pope county.

The Small Claims Procedure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Moose v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Markham v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. United Loan & Investment Co. v. ChiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Ashby v. MilliganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bonnell v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API