Legal Opinion

United Loan & Investment Co. v. Chilton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1956No. 5-862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Associate Justice.

The issue here is the constitutionality of Act 160 of 1955 insofar as it purports to invest municipal courts with jurisdiction of the subject matter in matters of contract where the amount in controversy is in excess of $300, excluding interest.

Appellant filed suit against appellee in the Municipal Court of Benton, Arkansas, for $330.00 plus interest allegedly due on a promissory note executed by appellee. The motion of appellee to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was overruled by the municipal court. Upon appellee’s failure to plead further, judgment was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Moose v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Bynum v. Patty and Devilbiss v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Magnet Cove Barium Corp. v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Lingo v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. C & M Used CarsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Peel v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API