United Loan & Investment Co. v. Chilton
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Minor W. Millwee, Associate Justice.
The issue here is the constitutionality of Act 160 of 1955 insofar as it purports to invest municipal courts with jurisdiction of the subject matter in matters of contract where the amount in controversy is in excess of $300, excluding interest.
Appellant filed suit against appellee in the Municipal Court of Benton, Arkansas, for $330.00 plus interest allegedly due on a promissory note executed by appellee. The motion of appellee to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was overruled by the municipal court. Upon appellee’s failure to plead further, judgment was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Moose v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Bynum v. Patty and Devilbiss v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Magnet Cove Barium Corp. v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Lingo v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wilson v. C & M Used CarsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Peel v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993