Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonnell v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 1995No. 95-147Published

1DissentRobert H. Dudley, Justice

The writ of prohibition should be issued because suit has never been commenced, and the circuit court is without jurisdiction over petitioner and is about to proceed against petitioner.

I

Brenda Bonnell filed suit in municipal court and obtained service on her former husband, petitioner, who now seeks a writ of prohibition. She sought replevin of a car valued at $3,900.00, which is in excess of the municipal court jurisdictional amount. Petitioner filed a motion to dismiss because the municipal court lacked jurisdiction.

A municipal court is a court of limited and restricted jurisdiction. Bynum…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hilburn v. First State Bank of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Chem-Ash, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Gillioz v. Kincannon, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Harvey v. Eastman Kodak Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API