Legal Opinion
Royer v. Deihl
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 1947No. Nos. 558, 559PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
The appeal in this case is from a judgment recovered by the appellee James R. Deihl against the appellant Frederick L. Royer for damages to the appellee’s automobile and other small incidental items resulting from a collision of the cars driven by the respective parties.
*723The assignments of error on appeal may be reduced to three, namely, (1) that the trial court (which sat without a jury) erred in allowing a police officer to testify as to certain conclusions reached by him upon arriving at the scene of the accident; (2) that the trial court erred in allowing a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bailey v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Fugate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- Anstine v. McWilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Ross Produce Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Service Center Associates v. HeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Grant v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Withers v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sawyer v. Monarch Cab CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Parham v. Cih Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.