Arlington Glass Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ROBSON, District Judge.
This is a civil antitrust suit brought by several independent glazing contractors, who install glass in offices and *51stores, against several large manufacturers and distributors, some of whom are alleged to be glazing contractors, for treble damages for violation of the Antitrust Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15.
The Complaint alleges a conspiracy by the defendants in discriminating as to prices between defendants and plaintiffs, charging the latter higher prices and thus preventing plaintiffs from obtaining bids for glazing contracts. The Complaint also charges refusal of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- In the Matter of the April 1956 Term Grand Jury. Byron A. Cain and Sally Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- In re RussoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- United States v. KilpatrickDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Amherst Leasing Corp. v. Emhart Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Carpenter v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.