Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1933No. M-425PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

On July 14, 1933, I entered an order relating to the testimony of George Leo Meyers and Harold Meyers, who had appeared and testified before the grand jury of this court sitting in Philadelphia in an investigation in the course of which a number of indictments have been returned charging a large number of persons with conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act. The relevant portion of the order is as follows: “Consent of this Court'is given for the use of the said testimony by the Government and the disclosure of the same by the stenographer who reported…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. In re National Window Glass WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1922
  4. Metzler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Atwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
  2. In the Matter of Applications for Orders Directing the Review or Release of Certain Grand Jury Testimony of Mario BiaggiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Adrian J. Short, Jr. Earl L. RiedelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Richard A. ClearyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API