Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Bongen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1996No. S-6526PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A home owned by Jerome Bongen and Elizabeth Bongen was destroyed by a mudslide. After their insurer denied coverage, the Bongens sued. They alleged that the mudslide was caused by construction activity carried out above their property. On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, the superior court held that a provision in the Bongens’ insurance policy excluding from coverage any loss resulting from earth movement, regardless of the cause, was unenforceable. We reverse.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Jerome Bongen and Elizabeth Bongen owned a home on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. HirschmannWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Howell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fayad v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Boazova v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API