Legal Opinion

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Martino

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiles F. McDonald, J.

Motion pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for a dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the same fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, denied.

(A) This is an action brought pursuant to section 473 of the Civil Practice Act, for a judgment declaring that the defendant, Francesco Martino, has violated section 3 of the conditions of a certain insurance contract issued by the plaintiff to the defendant Martino, in that the defendant Martino has failed to give the plaintiff notice of an alleged accident in which he was involved ;

(B)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Cohen v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Town of Putnam Valley v. SlutzkyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. American Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. of Illinois v. TraskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Allstate Insurance v. MangerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Tibbs v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Wallace v. Universal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  5. Allstate Insurance v. AlfordNew York Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API