Matter of Colman
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
PER CURIAM.,
We find that the respondent, attorney David J. Colman, violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(b) by intentionally taking deductions on his federal income tax returns to which he knew or should have known that he was not entitled. 1
This action formally commenced on October 24, 1996, with the Disciplinary Commission’s Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action. The allegations of attorney misconduct arose from the respondent’s 1996 federal felony criminal conviction of filing a false federal tax return. Based on that conviction, we suspended the respondent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Matter of TranskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re ColmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re ColmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re ColmanIndiana Supreme Court · 2008