In re O'Connell
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent, Lawrence B. O’Connell, and the Disciplinary Commission have tendered to this Court stipulated facts in which they state that the respondent engaged in certain actions which the Commission alleges violate the Pules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. As the final arbiter of attorney misconduct and sanction, this matter is now before us for final resolution. In re Huebner, 561 N.E.2d 492 (Ind.1990).
The respondent was admitted to the bar of this state in 1975 and is subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court. In December 1995, the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of HuebnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- In Matter of TranskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- In re SchnaitterIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- In re GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- In re HirschauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
4Cited by1 opinion
- Byrd v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2002