Legal Opinion

In re O'Connell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1997No. 79S00-9512-DI-1331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The respondent, Lawrence B. O’Connell, and the Disciplinary Commission have tendered to this Court stipulated facts in which they state that the respondent engaged in certain actions which the Commission alleges violate the Pules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. As the final arbiter of attorney misconduct and sanction, this matter is now before us for final resolution. In re Huebner, 561 N.E.2d 492 (Ind.1990).

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this state in 1975 and is subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court. In December 1995, the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of HuebnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Matter of TranskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In re SchnaitterIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In re GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In re HirschauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Byrd v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API