Legal Opinion

United States v. Commodore Park, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 26, 1945No. 495PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The United States dredged a tidewater navigable bay and deposited the dredged materials in a navigable arm of the bay called Mason Creek, thereby destroying its navigability, and impairing certain benefits alleged to inhere in the proximity of the land to a navigable tidewater creek. The broad question presented is whether the Fifth Amendment requires the government to compensate an owner of residential property contiguous to the creek, whose fast lands, though not physically invaded, were decreased in market value.

Commodore Park, Inc., an owner of lands on the creek about a mile away from…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API