State v. Heath
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
In cross-examination of defendant, the district attorney asked, “You took a lie detector test, didn’t you?” Counsel for defendant immediately interposed an objection which was properly sustained. It is argued that the question itself was suffi cient to justify a new trial for it was made with the purpose of getting prejudicial matter before the jury and left them with the idea that defendant had failed a lie detector test. In State v. Foye, 254 N.C. 704, 120 S.E. 2d 169 (1961) the Court held that the results of a polygraph test are not admissible in evidence to establish the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. FoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. MakersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994