Legal Opinion

State v. Heath

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7426SC973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

In cross-examination of defendant, the district attorney asked, “You took a lie detector test, didn’t you?” Counsel for defendant immediately interposed an objection which was properly sustained. It is argued that the question itself was suffi cient to justify a new trial for it was made with the purpose of getting prejudicial matter before the jury and left them with the idea that defendant had failed a lie detector test. In State v. Foye, 254 N.C. 704, 120 S.E. 2d 169 (1961) the Court held that the results of a polygraph test are not admissible in evidence to establish the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. State v. FoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. MakersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API