Legal Opinion

Tortomasi v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1939No. 6 Div. 520PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The questions argued by petitioner were not separately treated or discussed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and are not here for consideration under the limited review of this Court of the decisions of the Court of Appeals. Some of the decided cases are noted in Tennessee A. & G. R. v. Cardon, 235 Ala. 53, 177 So. 173, among them Folmar v. State, 217 Ala. 410, 116 So. 112.

Among the earlier cases is Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 176 Ala. 631, 58 So. 315, 317, wherein it was first observed that it was not the legislative intent the Court of Appeals “should be made merely a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Ex parte SteversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Robinson v. SteversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Blackwood v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. McMullian v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Clayton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. New York Life Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API