Blackwood v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The facts found by the Court of Appeals in the opinion now presented, incorporating by reference the facts recited in the former opinion (Blackwood v. Maryland Casualty Co., 24 Ala. App. 527, 137 So. 467), disclose that the attorney of the insured agreed in writing “that the action of the” insurer, “in participating in said trial and in representing the defendant” the insured “was not and should not be a waiver of the right of the” insurer “to claim and rely upon the want of co-operation of the” insured “as a valid defense to any liability of whatsoever kind of the” insurer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Senn v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Norman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Blackwood v. Maryland Casualty Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Charles v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Home Assurance Company v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sales Consultants of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Ex Parte Merchants Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Cook v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Employers Insurance Company of Alabama v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.