Robinson v. Steverson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
There are expressions in some of our earlier cases — see, especially, Sledge v. Swift, 53 Ala. 112 — to the effect that a plea of set-off need not observe the same precision of allegation which would be required in stating the same cause of action in an original complaint.
The effect of our recent decisions, however, is to place such a plea on the same footing as an original complaint, and to subject it to same tests as to the sufficiency of its allegations. J. C. Lysle Mill Co. v. North Ala. Gro. Co.,201 Ala. 222, 77 So. 748. We see no reason for changing this rule.
Applying this test to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNeil v. Munson S. S. LinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- J. C. Lysle Milling Co. v. North Alabama Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Goldsmith, Forcheimer & Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Vandiver & Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Hopson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Industrial Sav. Bank v. GreenwaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Parham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Russellville Gas Co. v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.