Legal Opinion
Wokas v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 12, 1997No. 1:96-cv-00297PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Dresser Industries, Inc.’s (“Dresser”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Limit Potential Damages under 35 U.S.C. § 287. For the reasons stated herein, Dresser’s motion is denied.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). However,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Anna M. Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- GTE Wireless, Inc. v. Qualcomm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
- In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Von Holdt v. A-1 Tool Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Hoover Co. v. Bissell Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.