Legal Opinion
Hoover Co. v. Bissell Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 19, 1999No. 5:98-cv-01088PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On October 1, 1998, Defendant Bissell Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment in this patent infringement case [Doc. 26], Bissell asks this Court for judgment finding it has not infringed on either patent owned by The Hoover Company (“Hoover”) involved in this action. Defendant Bissell also seeks judgment finding that Plaintiff Hoover cannot recover damages for conduct preceding the filing of this action.
Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the relevant record, the Court finds genuine issues of material fact on the issues of infringement and notice.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Lifted Limited, LLC v. Novelty Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2023