Legal Opinion

Stine v. Koga

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 24, 1990No. 09-89-042 CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Roland Nicholas Stine and Patricia Wal-drop Stine (“the Stines”) appeal from an order denying their motion to stay enforcement of a foreign judgment.

In September 1985, George Mitsuru Koga (“Koga”) filed a “Complaint” against the Stines in the circuit court of Hawaii, alleging default under the terms of an agreement of sale of a condominium. Koga sought judicial foreclosure of the property and a deficiency judgment. In January 1986 the Stines filed a counterclaim asserting a cause of action against Koga under the Hawaii Uniform Deceptive Trade Practice — Consumer…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Segrest v. SegrestTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. LindsayTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. International Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WoodsHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Collins v. Williamson Printing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fraud-Tech, Inc. v. Choicepoint, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. In Re VanDeWater, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Borum, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  4. Lemmon v. United Waste Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Fraud-Tech, Incorporated, Dean McGee, and Robert Andrews v. Choicepoint, Inc. F/K/A Database Technologies, Inc., the Information Connectivity Group, Inc., Thomas H. Hoolihan, Phillip Wamock, and Andrew Perlmutter, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API