Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Preston

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 18, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

W. ROGERS CLAY, COMMISSIONER

Affirming.

Appellee, Arthur Preston, brought this action against appellant, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, to recover damages for the destruction of his barn and1 contents by fire which he alleged was due to the negligence of the railway company. The first trial resulted in a hung jury. Upon the second trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee for the sum of $1,700. Prom the judgment based1 thereon, this appeal is prosecuted.

The only error assigned for reversal is the failure of the trial court to award appellant a peremptory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cin., N. O. & T. P. Ry Co. v. Sadieville Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. ScheibleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Hamburg-Bremen Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FeeneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API