Legal Opinion

Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Whittaker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 2, 1994No. 93-CA-002819-WC, 94-CA-2029-WCPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHRODER, Judge:

This is a petition for review, brought by appellant, Ingersoll-Rand Company (Inger-soll-Rand), and a protective petition for review, brought by cross-appellant, Special Fund, of a Workers’ Compensation Board’s (Board) decision of October 22, 1993. The issue boils down to whether the employer or the employee should bear the loss when the Board does not receive notice, as mandated by KRS 342.040, that the employer has ceased paying the injured employee tempo rary total disability payments (TTD). After reviewing the record and applicable authorities, we affirm the Board’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ready v. JamisonKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Messer v. DreesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  3. City of Frankfort v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  4. Newberg v. HudsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. H.E. Neumann Co. v. LeeKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Akers v. Pike County Board of EducationKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Colt Management Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  4. Lizdo v. Gentec EquipmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Billy Baker Painting v. BarryKentucky Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API