Legal Opinion

H.E. Neumann Co. v. Lee

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1998No. 98-SC-220-WCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

This matter is before the Court as an appeal by the employer from an opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board). The Board reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) ruling that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations provision found in KRS 342.185.

The sole issue herein is whether the statute of limitations period was tolled due to the fact that the employer failed to comply with the notice requirements of KRS 342.038 or KRS 342.040.

The relevant facts in this case are as follows: Claimant alleged that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Frankfort v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  2. Newberg v. HudsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. WhittakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994
  4. Colt Management Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Akers v. Pike County Board of EducationKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Billy Baker Painting v. BarryKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Patrick v. Christopher East Health CareKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kentucky Container Service, Inc. v. AshbrookKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Shelby Motor Co., Inc. v. QuireKentucky Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API